Apex Fund Services Ltd. et al v. Mathew Clingerman et al: Ruling on Leave to Appeal

Ruling refusing application for leave to appeal in Apex Fund Services Ltd. and Peter Hughes v. Mathew Clingerman, as Receiver of The Silk Road M3 Fund, a segregated account of Silk Road Funds Limited, and Silk Road Funds Limited at Bermuda Supreme Court.

- You’re only seeing part of this content
  
  To view the entire article or download the document, subscribe today.
  
  – Offshore Courts: 29,000+ court cases (Bahamas, Bermuda, BVI, Cayman Islands)
  – Investigative Articles: 4,500+ in-depth articles, including fraud exposés
  – MLATs – Criminal: 1,400+ MLATs on global criminal investigations
  – Ch. 15 – Insolvencies: Monitored daily
  – Foreign Discovery: Applications for foreign discovery filed in the USA, monitored daily
  – Regulatory Actions: Global regulatory actions, fines, and bans, monitored daily
  – And More: Criminal indictments, extraditions, winding-up petitions, and more
  
  Unlimited access for less than $3/day.
  
  Cancel anytime.
  
  SUBSCRIBE
- SIGN IN
  
  Forgot your password?

Pages: 10

Date: February 18, 2020

Defendants/Respondents: Mathew Clingerman, Silk Road Funds Limited

Plaintiffs/Applicants: Apex Fund Services Ltd., Peter Hughes

Case Number: Xx Xx Xx

Topic: Investment

Allegation: Fraud

Topics

Keywords

Alisher Ali Apex Fund Services Mathew Clingerman Peter Hughes Silk Road

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.

Apex Fund Services Ltd. et al v. Mathew Clingerman et al: Ruling on Leave to Appeal

You’re only seeing part of this content

Unlimited access for less than $3/day.

Related Content

Topics

Keywords

Related Content

Apex Fund Services Ltd. et al v. Mathew Clingerman et al: Ruling

Apex Fund Services Ltd. et al v. Mathew Clingerman et al: Originating Summons