BDO Cayman Ltd. et al v. The Governor et al: Ex Tempore Ruling

Ex Tempore Ruling in BDO Cayman Ltd., Deloitte and Touche, Ernst & Young Ltd., KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers v. The Governor in Cabinet and The Attorney General at the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands.

- You’re only seeing part of this content
  
  To view the entire article or download the document, subscribe today.
  
  – Offshore Courts: 29,000+ court cases (Bahamas, Bermuda, BVI, Cayman Islands)
  – Investigative Articles: 4,500+ in-depth articles, including fraud exposés
  – MLATs – Criminal: 1,400+ MLATs on global criminal investigations
  – Ch. 15 – Insolvencies: Monitored daily
  – Foreign Discovery: Applications for foreign discovery filed in the USA, monitored daily
  – Regulatory Actions: Global regulatory actions, fines, and bans, monitored daily
  – And More: Criminal indictments, extraditions, winding-up petitions, and more
  
  Unlimited access for less than $3/day.
  
  Cancel anytime.
  
  SUBSCRIBE
- SIGN IN
  
  Forgot your password?

Pages: 6

Date: November 04, 2016

Defendants/Respondents: The Governor in Cabinet, The Attorney General

Plaintiffs/Applicants: BDO Cayman Ltd., Deloitte and Touche, Ernst & Young Ltd., KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers

Case Number: Xx Xx Xx

Topic: Accounting

Judge: Ingrid Mangatal

Plaintiffs/Applicants Attorneys: Maples Group, Mac Imrie, Christian La-Roda Thomas, Colin McKie KC

Topics

Accounting Cayman Islands

Keywords

BDO Deloitte Ernst & Young Ltd. KPMG PricewaterhouseCoopers

The Attorney General The Governor in Cabinet

[ 2 more... ] [ top 5 ]

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.

BDO Cayman Ltd. et al v. The Governor et al: Ex Tempore Ruling

You’re only seeing part of this content

Unlimited access for less than $3/day.

Related Content

Topics

Keywords

Related Content

BDO Cayman Ltd. et al v. The Governor et al: Judicial Review