Judgment regarding “Interlocutory appeal – Appeal against order appointing joint provisional liquidators – Standing – Whether Mr. Wang had standing to apply for the appointment of joint provisional liquidators over RAGOF – Bare trusts – Whether XYZ held the XYZ shares on a bare trust for Mr. Wang – Derivative claims – Whether there were special circumstances entitling Mr. Wang to seek the appointment of joint provisional liquidators over RAGOF on a derivative basis – Abuse of court – Subsequent interlocutory proceedings – Whether a subsequent interlocutory application involving the same parties and same issues runs afoul of the abuse of court principles – Whether the dismissal of Ladd v Marshall applications precludes an applicant from introducing that same evidence in the subsequent interlocutory application – The rule in Hollington v Hewthorn – Whether the rule in Hollington v Hewthorn applies to the reliance on decisions of another court in interlocutory applications” in Floreat Real Estate Limited, described as “a professional fund incorporated in Jersey” v. XYZ, described as “a company registered in England”; Chia Hsing Wang, and Real Assets (RA) Global Opportunity Fund I Ltd., described as a British Virgin Islands entity whose assets include “real property in England known as ‘Springs Farm’”, at the British Virgin Islands Court of Appeal.
Topics
British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands Channel Islands England JerseyKeywords
Chia-Hsing Wang Floreat Group Floreat Real Estate Real Assets (RA) Global Opportunity Fund Springs Farm