Kamil Kuklineski v. Binance Capital Management Co. Ltd. et al: Notice of Removal

Notice of Removal of a Class Action Complaint alleging unjust enrichment and violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act in Kamil Kuplineski, a resident of Illinois v. Binance Capital Management Co. Ltd., d.b.a. Binance, described as a cryptocurrency exchange that is domiciled in the British Virgin Islands after being “initially founded in China” before moving to Japan, then Malta, and denying it was domiciled in the Cayman Islands; BAM Trading Services, d.b.a. Binance US, described as a Delaware company based in San Francisco, and Jumio Corporation at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

- You’re only seeing part of this content
  
  To view the entire article or download the document, subscribe today.
  
  – Offshore Courts: 29,000+ court cases (Bahamas, Bermuda, BVI, Cayman Islands)
  – Investigative Articles: 4,500+ in-depth articles, including fraud exposés
  – MLATs – Criminal: 1,400+ MLATs on global criminal investigations
  – Ch. 15 – Insolvencies: Monitored daily
  – Foreign Discovery: Applications for foreign discovery filed in the USA, monitored daily
  – Regulatory Actions: Global regulatory actions, fines, and bans, monitored daily
  – And More: Criminal indictments, extraditions, winding-up petitions, and more
  
  Unlimited access for less than $3/day.
  
  Cancel anytime.
  
  SUBSCRIBE
- SIGN IN
  
  Forgot your password?

Pages: 33

Date: November 12, 2021

Defendants/Respondents: Binance Capital Management Co. Ltd., BAM Trading Services, Jumio Corporation

Case Number: Xx Xx Xx

Topic: Crypto

Plaintiffs/Applicants: Kamil Kuklineski

Topics

USA

[ 1 more... ] [ top 5 ]

Keywords

Binance Changpeng Zhao Jumio Corporation Kamil Kuklineski

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.