SEC v. Arbitrade Ltd. et al: Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (‘$37M Crypto Investment Fraud’)

Defendants’ Motion for a Limited Protective Order Regarding Depositions of Non-Party Witnesses in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arbitrade Ltd., of Bermuda; Cryptobontix Inc., of Canada; Troy Hogg, of Canada; James L. Goldberg, Stephen L. Braverman, and Max W. Barber at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Pages: 4

Date: August 05, 2024

Defendants/Respondents: Arbitrade Ltd., Cryptobontix Inc., Troy Hogg, James L. Goldberg, Stephen L. Braverman, Max W. Barber

Allegation: Fraud

Case Number: Xx Xx Xx

Topic: Crypto, Investment

Defendants/Respondents Attorneys: Andrew Levi, Jeffrey Eilender, Eduardo Maura, Lehr Levi & Levi, Schlam Stone & Dolan, Ayala Law

Plaintiffs/Applicants: Securities and Exchange Commission

Topics

USA

[ 1 more... ] [ top 5 ]

Keywords

Arbitrade Cryptobontix James Goldberg Max Barber Stephen Braverman

Troy Hogg

[ 1 more... ] [ top 5 ]

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.

SEC v. Arbitrade Ltd. et al: Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (‘$37M Crypto Investment Fraud’)

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.

Related Content

Topics

Keywords

Related Content

‘Embarrassed’ Bermuda witnesses to alleged $37M investment fraud will only testify in secret, claim defendants

SEC v. Arbitrade Ltd. et al: Complaint (‘$37M Crypto Fraud’)