S&P Global Inc. v. Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. et al: Complaint

Complaint alleging “FMG is seeking to prevent SPGI from continuing to publish newsworthy pricing information that FMG would prefer not be published” and “sought to circumvent both the First Amendment and its own contractual obligations by turning to the UK courts” in S&P Global Inc., “the leading independent provider of information and benchmark prices for the energy and commodities markets”, of New York v. Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. , described as “one of the largest producers of iron ore in the world”, and Chichester Metals Pty Ltd., both of Australia, at the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

- You’re only seeing part of this content
  
  To view the entire article or download the document, subscribe today.
  
  – Offshore Courts: 29,000+ court cases (Bahamas, Bermuda, BVI, Cayman Islands)
  – Investigative Articles: 4,500+ in-depth articles, including fraud exposés
  – MLATs – Criminal: 1,400+ MLATs on global criminal investigations
  – Ch. 15 – Insolvencies: Monitored daily
  – Foreign Discovery: Applications for foreign discovery filed in the USA, monitored daily
  – Regulatory Actions: Global regulatory actions, fines, and bans, monitored daily
  – And More: Criminal indictments, extraditions, winding-up petitions, and more
  
  Unlimited access for less than $3/day.
  
  Cancel anytime.
  
  SUBSCRIBE
- SIGN IN
  
  Forgot your password?

Pages: 56

Date: April 29, 2020

Defendants/Respondents: Fortescue Metals Group Ltd., Chichester Metals Pty Ltd.

Plaintiffs/Applicants Attorneys: Benjamin Marks, Weil Gotshal & Manges

Case Number: Xx Xx Xx

Topic: Investment

Plaintiffs/Applicants: S&P Global Inc.

Topics

Australia Investment USA United Kingdom

Keywords

Argus Media Limited Chichester Metals Pty Ltd. Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. S&P Global Inc.

BECOME A SUBSCRIBER

Daily red flags in high-value international finance

Unlimited access. No contracts. Cancel anytime.