Amended Answer and Counter-Claim by Ross B. Glickman in Superkite Pty Limited v. Ross B. Glickman, Urban Hayman Management, LLC, Urban Hayman Holdings, LLC, and Urban Hayman JV, LLC and Ross B. Glickman, Urban Hayman Management, LLC, Urban Hayman Holdings, LLC, and Urban Hayman JV, LLC v. Hayman Private Equity, LLC, Hayman Private Equity Australia (Pty), Ltd., Roland Husner, Roland Frank Bleyer, Andrew Bacik, James Napoli, Christopher Dieterich, Robert Masud, John Stammers at the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
- Home
- Jurisdictions
- Australia
- Superkite Pty Ltd. v. Ross B. Glickman et al: Amended Answer & Counter-Claim
Australia Civil Courts Documents Fraud Investment Miscellaneous United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois USAFebruary 19, 2013
Superkite Pty Ltd. v. Ross B. Glickman et al: Amended Answer & Counter-Claim
621
February 19, 2013
Ross B. Glickman, Urban Hayman Management, LLC, Urban Hayman JV, LLC, Urban Hayman Holdings, LLC
Superkite Pty Limited
Topics
Australia Fraud Investment USAKeywords
Andrew Bacik Christopher Dieterich Hayman Private Equity Australia (Pty), Ltd. Hayman Private Equity, LLC James Napoli